Argument: The petitioners argued that the continued failure and inaction of the concerned authorities to redress the water logging in the area resulted in inhuman suffering of the people and in effect, constituted flagrant violations of their constitutionally guaranteed rights to life, livelihood and property under Articles 32 and 42 read with Articles 15, 17 and 20 of the Constitution.
Order: The Court directed the government to show cause within a month as to why the failure to redress the prolonged water logging in the three Upazilas of Jessore affecting the lives, properties, livelihood, safety, and health of the people should not be declared to be without lawful authority and why they should not be directed to draw up necessary action plans in consultation with the local people and why a direction should not be issued upon respondents to form an appropriate committee to permanently resolve the catastrophe and arrange for adequate compensation for the local people against the losses resulting from such waterlogging.
No comments:
Post a Comment