Fact:
The petitioner Rezaul Karim had married Most. Taslima
Begum under Muslim Shariat on 10.02.1985 and thereafter she was kept by her
husband in her father's house, but her husband used to come and live with her in that
house as husband and wife and as a result, she conceived and gave birth to a female
child. At this stage, her brother requested her husband to take their sister to
his home when the petitioner's husband demanded Tk.10000 in return. On the refusal
of her brother to pay Tk.10000, the petitioner left his father-in-law's house
threatening that he would never take her to his home. For that reason, Most.
Taslima Begum instituted the C.R. case No 248 of 1986 on 17.07.1986 under the Dowry
Prohibition Act, 1980 against the petitioner Rezaul Karim and his father Abdul
Hashem Talukder before the learned upazila Magistrate, Mathbaria.
Issue:
Whether the
petitioner has been convicted on charge framing under the Dowry Prohibition Act,
1980.
Decision:
There is no substance in this application and the said
application is therefore rejected.
Justification:
The petitioner demanded that the proceeding be quashed,
arguing that the demand for money did not come within the definition of dowry
under the Act, that is, demanding money in consideration for marriage. The
Court disagreed, holding that the demand for money by a husband after marriage
in exchange for giving the wife the status of a wife, maintaining and
supporting her as a wife, and providing her with shelter as a wife amounts to a
demand for dowry under Dowry Prohibition Act, 1980.
Sharif Ahmed
Department of Land Management and Law
Jagannath University, Dhaka
0 Comments